Fri. Oct 7th, 2022


Delhi court transfers money laundering case against Satyendar Jain to another Judge, Satyendar Jain
picture supply : PTI/ REPRESENTATIONAL (FILE). Delhi courtroom transfers money laundering case in opposition to Satyendar Jain to a distinct decide.

Highlights

  • courtroom allowed ED petition that sought swap of money laundering case associated to Satyendar Jain
  • decide Vinay Kumar Gupta agreed to swap Satyender Jain case to a distinct decide
  • Now, the case has been transferred to particular decide Vikas Dhull

money laundering case: The Principal District and intervals courtroom of Rouse Avenue Courts on Friday (September 23) allowed the Enforcement Directorate petition that sought the swap of a money laundering case associated to Aam Aadmi celebration (AAP) MLA Satyendar Jain.

The Principal District and intervals decide Vinay Kumar Gupta on Friday agreed to swap the Satyender Jain money laundering to a distinct decide and listed the matter afresh for listening to right now itself.

Now the case has been transferred to particular decide Vikas Dhull.Earlier it was heard in size by particular decide Geetanjali Goel.On Thursday, all by means of arguments of ED, ASG SV Raju submitted that there was an try and hunt medical bail by means of the use of false medical studies. The courtroom did not take any movement. He has been dealing with the Delhi Prisons too as a Minister and may use power, money, and affect.

“Satyendar Jain was additionally the jail minister. He spent extra usually than not inside the hospital all by means of judicial custody, the medical report was given faux…we gave all of the paperwork to the courtroom, however nothing occurred,” ASG Raju added.

displaying for Jain, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal submitted that he was shifted to LNJP Hospital and as per the jail handbook no violation was held.

When the identical decide granted remand to Satyendar Jain then it was super.ED plea in search of the swap of the case to a distinct is clearly displaying a malafide rivals. the underside taken by the ED is completely imprecise.

Earlier the courtroom of District decide had stayed Satyendar Jain’s trial after ED plea sought swap of the case and issued discover to all of the accused individuals. The courtroom was presently listening to the prolonged arguments on the bail petitions of Satyendar Jain and the selection two co-accused Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain inside the matter. The bail listening to of the accused was on the final stage.

All three individuals are at the second in Judicial Custody.Senior Advocate N Hariharan, displaying for Satyendar Jain, expressed his displeasure with particular decide Geetanjali Goel and submitted, “it is actually unfair. completely uncalled for. They’re preempting issues. We’ll oppose it tooth and nail.”

The ED had arrested Satyendar Jain and two others in a money laundering case primarily based on a CBI FIR lodged in opposition to the AAP chief in 2017 beneath the Prevention of Corruption Act beneath which he was accused of getting laundered money by means of 4 firms allegedly linked to him.

On September sixteen, the ED quizzed Jain contained in the Jail in relation to the Excise coverage case.particular decide Geetanjali Goel allowed the equipment moved by the ED in search of permission to impeach Satyendar Jain inside the excise coverage case.

at the second the courtroom additionally took cognizance of the Prosecution grievance (Chargesheet) filed by the ED in opposition to Satyendar Jain, his spouse, and eight others collectively with 4 firms in reference to the money laundering case.

The ED on June 6 claimed to have seized Rs 2.eighty five crore in money and 133 gold cash weighing 1.eighty kg from Satyendra Jain’s aides all by means of its day-prolonged raid performed at numerous areas throughout Delhi and the nationwide Capital area (NCR). all by means of these raids, the agency additionally seized numerous incriminating paperwork and digital data.

The ED had initiated the money-laundering investigation on the thought of a essential information Report registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on August 24, 2017, beneath part thirteen(2) r/w thirteen(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in opposition to Satyendar Jain, Poonam Jain, Ajit Prasad Jain, Sunil Kumar Jain, Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain.

(With ANI inputs) 

additionally study: Satyendar Jain bail: SC directs intervals courtroom to hearken to ED plea in search of swap of listening to

additionally study: Delhi courtroom stays bail proceedings in Satyendar Jain money laundering case

latest India information





Sourcelink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.